931 F. Supp. 1115 - Freeman v. Complex Computing Co., Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2017
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Landis v. North American Co. · Murphy v. American Home Products Corp. · 19 Cal. 3d 22 - Ray v. Alad Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“marketing [C3's] software products, developing new software products, enhancing [C3's] existing software products, and providing support services to [C3's] clients.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“given that there is no continuity of ownership, physical location, management, assets, or personnel, nor a dissolution of C3, there has not been a de facto merger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]o regard [Glazier] as anything but the sole stockholder and controlling person of C3 would be to exalt form over substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.