931 F. Supp. 2d 794 - Monaghan v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4980D (§ 402 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 26 U.S.C. § 4980H · 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C · 42 U.S.C. § 300G · 5 U.S.C. § 500
Relies on Elrod v. Burns · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Sherbert v. Verner · Roberts v. United States Jaycees · Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Supreme Court[ ] [had] recently] deni[ed] ... an injunction pending appeal in Hobby Lobby.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.