Cissna v. Stout’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2024
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arco Alaska, Inc. v. State · Keane v. Local Boundary Commission · Carr v. Thomas · Carney v. State, Board of Fisheries · Fischer v. Stout
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While opinions of the attorney general are entitled to some deference, they are not controlling on matters of statutory interpretation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“implicate an agency's special expertise or determination of fundamental poli-cles.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The address of a voter as it appears on the official voter registration record is presumptive evidence of the person's voting residence. This presumption is negated only if the voter notifies the [D]irector in writing of a change in voting residence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dodge v. Meyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.