Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

931 So. 2d 1059

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-07-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2014

3 state decisions

Relies on 559 So. 2d 218 - Tucker v. State · Birdsong v. State · State v. Reese

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The state concedes that Appellant’s conviction must be reversed and remanded for a new trial because the record was devoid of a written waiver of a jury trial, nor did the record reflect the trial court conducted an inquiry as to whether Appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived jury trial. Tucker v. State, 559 So.2d 218 (Fla.1990); Mickens v. State, 773 So.2d 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hyler v. State, 732 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). All other issues are moot.

¶2Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

STONE, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.
/931/so2d/1059 · .json · Public domain