Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 931 SO2D 164 - State v. Cino

State v. Cino’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Schmerber v. State of California · Kastigar v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as specified in this subsection, each crash report made by a person involved in a crash and any statement made by such person to a law enforcement officer for the purpose of completing a crash report required by this section shall be without prejudice to the individual so reporting. No such report or statement shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal. However, subject to the applicable rules of evidence, a law enforcement officer at a criminal trial may testify as to any statement made to the officer by the person involved in the crash if that person’s privilege against self-incrimination is not violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.