LeBlanc v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Culbreath v. Johnson · Madden v. Rhodes · 453 So. 2d 1294 - Tucker v. Tucker · 847 So. 2d 843 - Lauro v. Lauro · 691 So. 2d 897 - Holloman v. Holloman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the chancellor, being the only one to hear the testimony of the witnesses and observe their demeanor, is in the best position to judge their credibility. Moreover, since the chancellor is best able to determine the credibility of the witness' testimony, it is not [an appellate court's] province to undermine the chancellor's authority by replacing the chancellor's judgment with our own.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.