931 So. 2d 999 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 699 So. 2d 1312 - Franqui v. State · Cotton v. State · 532 So. 2d 75 - Guerrero v. State · Cave v. State · Saulsberry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“designed to determine whether the jurors could correctly apply the law, are permissible.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.