Ludwig v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Henderson v. State (1997), White v. State (2001)
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trammel v. United States · Boykin v. State · Wolfle v. United States · Burks v. State · Cole v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a comma should precede a conjunction connecting two coordinate clauses or phrases in a statute in order to prevent the following qualifying phrases from modifying the clause preceding the conjunction”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[g]enerally, the presence of a comma separating a modifying clause in a statute from the clause immediately preceding is an indication that the modifying clause was intended to modify all the preceding clauses and not only the last antecedent one”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Senn v. State · Matter of Maharle“[in a proceeding in which the accused is charged with a] crime against the person of any minor child or any member of the household, of either spouse.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.