Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 931 SW2D 322 - Loserth v. State

Loserth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 175th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Scharffe v. Perkins · Clewis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the subsequent points of error seek to exclude some evidence that went to the jury, and include some evidence that did not, our review of factual insufficiency is done with a view as to what the jury actually heard without consideration of the two other points of error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.