Talbert v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
932 F.2d 1064 · 1991
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Franklin v. United States (1993), Borneman v. United States (2000)
12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680
Relies on Dalehite v. United States · United States v. Neustadt · Kosak v. United States · Birnbaum v. United States · Quinones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'we must turn to the "traditional and commonly understood legal definition of the tort”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny claim arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference in contract rights ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.