Empire State Bank v. Citizens State Bank’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 12 U.S.C. § 1823
Relies on D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Langley v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Griffin · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Newhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) Agreements against Interests of Corporation. No agreement which tends to diminish or defeat the interest of the Corporation in any asset acquired by it under this section or section 1821 of this title, either as security for a loan or by purchase or as receiver of any insured depository institution, shall be valid against the Corporation unless such agreement— (1) is in writing, (2) was executed by the depository institution and any person claiming an adverse interest thereunder, including the obligor, contemporaneously with the acquisition of the asset by the depository institution, (3) was approved by the board of directors of the depository institution or its loan committee, which approval shall be reflected in the minutes of said board or committee, and (4) has been, continuously, from the time of its execution, an official record of the depository institution.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“would be a plain miscarriage of justice or inconsistent with substantial justice,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must decide a 'disputable issue of federal law'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.