Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 932 F.2d 1540 - Baris v. Sulpicio Lines Inc

Baris v. Sulpicio Lines Inc’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

159
cited by 159 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 159 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably El-Fadl v. Central Bank (1996), Jones v. Petty-Ray Geophysical, Geosource, Inc. (1992)

52 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

9801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1333 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 45 U.S.C. § 822

Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Carnegie v. United States · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Scharffe v. Perkins · Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 159 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any defect that does not go to the question of whether the case originally could have been brought in federal district court....”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'when section 1447(c) speaks of any defect in removal procedure, it includes within its reach the bringing of an action not within the court's removal jurisdiction but that could have been brought originally in that court.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] motion to remand [under the first sentence of section 1447(c) ] must be made within 30 days after removal, if the objections are of a character that can be waived, such as formal and modal matters pertaining to the procedure for removal or the non-removability of a proceeding otherwise within federal jurisdiction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.