Counts v. Wang Laboratories, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
932 F.2d 338 · 1991
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 547
Relies on Northen v. Quinn Wholesale, Inc. · Bernstein v. RJL Leasing · O'Neill Pr v. Nestle Libbys Pr Inc · Continental Commodities Inc Id 56-1207008 Durham v. Smith Metal and Iron Company · Evans v. United Life & Accident Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ttorney malfeasance which actively misleads a client or is comparably culpable might successfully ground a Rule 60(b) motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the commercial arena, for most purposes, payment by check is the end of a commercial transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'poor lawyering' by ... counsel cannot properly ground [a] Rule 60(b) motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.