United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
932 F.2d 752 · 1991
Citation profile
132 federal appellate · 8 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 233 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably United States v. Robinson (1992), 8 Cal. 4th 68 - People v. Tyrell J. (1994)
132 federal appellate · 8 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 3156 (§ 201 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · Carnegie v. United States · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Rawlings v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 233 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[d]eclaring a mistrial is appropriate only where a cautionary instruction is unlikely to cure the prejudicial effect of an error.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the evidence and all reasonable inferences which could be drawn from it, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government,'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.