United States v. Lundquist’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1372 (§ 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972) · 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1857 · 16 U.S.C. § 668 · 16 U.S.C. § 703 (Arctic Tundra Habitat Emergency Conservation Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · United States v. Lopez · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Sherbert v. Verner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Government may substantially burden a person's exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person — (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the possession of eagle parts is an activity which affects a broad regulatory scheme relating to commercial transactions and which, when viewed in the aggregate with similar activities nationwide, substantially affects interstate commerce”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.