Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 932 NW2D 101 - State v. Nelson

State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ebertz · State v. Rufus · State v. Yost · State v. Foley · Dunn v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"the phrase 'the prior conviction for which imposition of sentence is deferred' refers to a deferred sentence that has not been dismissed.... Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 32.1, the court could not consider Nelson's previous conviction because it had been dismissed and the court erred by using the dismissed case to trigger the mandatory minimum sentence. Had the prior offense not yet been dismissed, the State would then have been entitled to an opportunity to 'plead and prove' the prior conviction under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-02(4). However, once a case is dismissed, the State may not plead and prove a previous conviction."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n any subsequent prosecution, for any other offense, the prior conviction for which imposition of sentence is deferred may be pleaded and proved....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.