Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 932 SO2D 1251 - Vanderpol v. Frengut

Vanderpol v. Frengut’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maxwell Bldg. Corp. v. Euro Concepts, LLC · Joseph v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Having the parties police themselves, instead of requiring judicial intervention on section 57.105 issues, promotes judicial economy and minimizes litigation costs.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion by a party seeking sanctions under this section must be served but may not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 21 days after service of the motion, the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation, or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.