Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

932 So. 2d 321

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-02-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2007

2 state decisions

Relies on 911 So. 2d 229 - King v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-02-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ALTENBERND, Judge.

¶1Morris K. Anderson appeals the denial of his motion for relief from judgment, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, which challenges his designation as a sexual predator. Although this court recently receded from its prior case law on this issue in King v. State, 911 So.2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that challenges to a sexual predator designation should now be raised through a motion for postconviction relief), the trial court fully addressed Anderson’s claims on the merits, whether considered as a rule 1.540 motion or as a motion for postconviction relief. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Anderson’s claim.

¶2Affirmed.

CANADY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.
/932/so2d/321 · .json · Public domain