Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 932 SO2D 601 - Pearson v. Pearson

Pearson v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on LaLoggia-VonHegel v. VonHegel · Leonard v. State · 764 So. 2d 860 - Milian v. State · 932 So. 2d 270 - Buchanan v. Buchanan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the order of contempt is not supported by competent substantial evidence, we reverse.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.