Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 932 SW2D 225 - Dorman v. Arnold

Dorman v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2017

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 71st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Slay v. Burnett Trust · Holley v. Watts · Bishop v. Bishop · Larson v. Cook Consultants, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “He who attempts to establish title to property through a gift inter vivos, as against the estate of a decedent, takes upon himself a heavy burden, which he must support by evidence of clear and probative force, which clearly establishes every element of a valid gift.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) [donor's] intent to make a gift; (2) [donor's] delivery of the property; and (3)[donee's] acceptance of the property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A: [Ridgeway] said his health was getting worse and that I had been real good to him and I had taken real good care of him and he wanted me to have his money if something happened to him.... Q: And if there was any left when he passed away it was to go to you? A: Right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.