Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

932 S.W.2d 449

Pero v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-10-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2015

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-10-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2David A. Pero (Pero) appeals his termination as a police officer by the St. Louis Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners (Board) which was affirmed by the circuit court.

¶3We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reason for our holding.

/932/sw2d/449 · .json · Public domain