Velasquez v. Teltschik’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Linwood v. NCNB Texas · Azbill v. Dallas County Child Protective Services Unit of the Texas Department of Human & Regulatory Services · White v. Baker & Botts · Lopez v. Foremost Paving, Inc. · Maniccia v. Johnson & Gibbs, P.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if we entertained appellant’s motion on its merits, we could not find it contains a “reasonable explanation” for the necessity of an extension. Appellant’s contention that he could not have anticipated the trial court’s finding of “not in good faith” (sic) lacks credence since the trial court found his affidavit of indigence filed in December 1995 to initiate his suit to be “false, frivolous, and malicious.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.