¶1ORDER
¶2Mary S. Laulo (Contestant), pro se, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, her challenge to primary election results, § 115.526, RSMo 1994. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).