Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 A2D 1072 - Flood v. Silfies

Flood v. Silfies’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stickel v. Ohio Casualty Co. · Pappas v. Asbel · Guinn v. Alburtis Fire Co. · Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs · 103 Pa. Commw. 303 - Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny Commonwealth agency or any political subdivision or municipal or other local authority, or any officer or agency of any such political subdivision or local authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “government unit other than the Commonwealth government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.