Robinson v. Ponte’s Empirical Analysis
933 F.2d 101 · 1991
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Teague v. Lane · Pointer v. Texas · Cupp v. Naughten · McCleskey v. Zant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.