Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 F.2d 111 - United States v. Chartier

United States v. Chartier’s Empirical Analysis

933 F.2d 111 · 1991

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

53 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably United States v. Rosa (1993), United States v. Rivera (1992)

53 federal appellate ·

490199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Lane v. Peterson · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Though a sentencing judge retains discretion ... he must demonstrate that he has thoughtfully discharged his statutory obligation [under § 3553(c) ], with a degree of care appropriate to the severity of the punishment ultimately selected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he court, at the time of sentencing, shall state in open court ... the reason for imposing a sentence at a particular point within the range.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “fully comply with the requirement of section 3553(c)(1),”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.