Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 F.2d 325 - Taylor v. Whitley

Taylor v. Whitley’s Empirical Analysis

933 F.2d 325 · 1991

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
9
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably United States v. Cothran (2002), United States v. Pollen (1992)

28 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

370199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Barker v. Wingo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'deliberate relinquishment' requirement does not apply to double jeopardy violations that are not apparent on the face of the indictments or trial court record at the time the defendant enters his plea”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if a double jeopardy violation is apparent on the face of the indictment and/or the record existing at the time the plea was entered, it is not waived”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “voluntary and intelligent guilty plea does not become vulnerable to habeas corpus review simply because later judicial decisions indicate that the plea rested on a faulty premise or that the legal and factual evaluations of the defendant's counsel were incorrect,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.