Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 F.2d 341 - Teal v. Eagle Fleet, Inc.

Teal v. Eagle Fleet, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

933 F.2d 341 · 1991

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably Hardy v. Gulf Oil Corp. (1992), Trust Company Bank v. United States Gypsum Company (1992)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

3601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Logarusic v. United States · Porzig v. Nolden · Garrett v. Co · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A pleading or count setting forth a claim for relief within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction that is also within the jurisdiction of the district court on some other ground may contain a statement identifying the claim as an admiralty or maritime claim for purposes of Rules 14(e), 38(e), 82, and the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims. If the claim is cognizable only in admiralty, it is an admiralty or maritime claim for those purposes whether so identified or not.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whether this court treats the motion under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) depends on the time at which the motion is served.”); see also Delgado v. Shell Oil Co., 231 F.3d 165, 182 (5th Cir.2000) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The district court enjoys considerable discretion when determining whether the movant has satisfied any of these Rule 60(b) standards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.