Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 F.2d 539 - United States v. Biesiadecki

United States v. Biesiadecki’s Empirical Analysis

933 F.2d 539 · 1991

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
February 2022
most recently cited

37 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. (1998), United States v. Koen (1992)

37 federal appellate ·

4201991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Schmuck v. United States · American Petrofina Co. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union Local No. 4-23 · In re Disbarment of Kleindienst · Badders v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the mail and wire fraud statutes it is unlawful to make false or misleading statements in furtherance of the scheme. It is also unlawful to speak half truths or to omit to state facts necessary to make the statements made in light of the circumstances under which they were made not misleading. Absent such circumstances mere omissions do not constitute fraud under the mail and wire fraud statutes ____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “government presented extensive evidence of ... affirmative misrepresentations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.