Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 F.2d 581 - Thompson v. Sullivan

Thompson v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

933 F.2d 581 · 1991

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Craig v. Chater (1996), Luna v. Shalala (1994)

16 federal appellate · 8 district ·

440199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Lashley v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Thompson v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “scrupulously and conscientiously probe into, inquire of, and explore for all relevant facts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the manner in which an attorney can aid in the proceedings, (2) the possibility of free counsel or a contingency arrangement, and (3) the limitation on attorney fees to 25 percent of past due benefits and required court approval of the fees.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]t the very least, more thorough questioning of Thompson would have been appropriate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.