Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 P.2d 1139 - Johnson v. Doris

Johnson v. Doris’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2017

5 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hartland v. Hartland · Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc. · McCracken v. Davis · Matter of Estate of Ridl · Wellmix, Inc. v. City of Anchorage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The personal representative's final accounting did not adequately support [the professional fees charged to the estate]. No showing was made that particular services were needed; no showing was made as to the number of hours spent. We note that the probate court should have been alerted by the amount of the professional expenses relative to the size of the estate, and should have given substantive consideration to the proposed fees and costs. [25]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Mistakes — Inadvertence—Excusable Neglect— Newly Discovered Evidence — Fraud—Etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party's legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect;....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]laims against the estate totaled $228,419.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.