Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 P2D 1157 - Wallace v. State

Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2015

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 3062 · 10 U.S.C. § 375 · 10 U.S.C. § 8062 · 18 U.S.C. § 1385 · 32 U.S.C. § 109 · 32 U.S.C. § 112

Relies on County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · Texas v. New Mexico · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · 9 Cal. 3d 626 - Lorenzana v. Superior Court · Perpich v. Department of Defense

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if police utilize normal means of access to and egress from the house for some legitimate purpose, such as to make inquiries of the occupant, ... it is not a Fourth Amendment search for the police to see or hear or smell from that vantage point what is happening inside the dwelling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Where no evidence indicating otherwise is produced, the presumption of regularity supports the official acts of public officers, and courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “courts have routinely allowed police to employ non-coercive trickery in the course of investigations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.