State v. Titus’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mattox v. United States · Tanner v. United States · McDonald v. Pless · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Parker v. Gladden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These guarantees are premised on the idea that the jury functions as a representative body, that it should express the knowledge and sentiments of the community affected by its decisions, and that jurors should therefore be chosen from among the people who live in that locality.... [T]he drafters of the two constitutions believed that, generally speaking, there is a better chance that justice will be done if jurors are selected from people familiar with the community’s culture and general conditions of life.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Titus v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.