McClellan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · State v. Keffer · Hodges v. State · McCone v. State · Urrutia v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rouse v. State“evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Willis v. State“Evidence which is not relevant is not admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Willis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.