933 So. 2d 1014 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 460 So. 2d 778 - May v. State · 735 So. 2d 1099 - Colenburg v. State · 722 So. 2d 1255 - Sneed v. State · 271 So. 2d 445 - Leonard v. State · 732 So. 2d 172 - Fleming v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. Because the circuit court did not distinguish that sentence among the three charges, we remanded for clarification of sentence. Id. As guidance, we instructed the circuit court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Issac v. State“According to the Mississippi Supreme Court, the reviewing court may address issues as plain error `when the trial court has impacted upon a fundamental right of the defendant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that once a circuit or county court exercises its option to impose a definite sentence it cannot subsequently set that sentence aside and impose a greater sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Issac v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.