Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

933 So. 2d 1254

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-07-24

Relies on McCellan v. State

Decided 2006-07-24

PER CURIAM.

¶1Lloyd Williams appeals his convictions for possession of cocaine, resisting arrest without violence, possession of drug paraphernalia, and giving a false name, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. Because appellant’s equal protection argument was not raised below, it was not preserved for appeal. See McCellan v. State, 768 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We have examined the facts adduced at the suppression hearing, and we find that fundamental error did not occur.

¶2AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, AND LEWIS, JJ., concur.
/933/so2d/1254 · .json · Public domain