Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 SO2D 1277 - Sobota v. State

Sobota v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · 929 So. 2d 4 - Johnson v. State · Schultz v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Does admission of a test result from a legal blood draw violate the Confrontation Clause and Crawford v. Washington , when the toxicologist who performed the blood test does not testify?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an FDLE lab report prepared pursuant to a police investigation and admitted to establish an element of a crime is testimonial hearsay even if it is admitted as a business record”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.