Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 SO2D 45 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 837 So. 2d 366 - Reed v. State · Stewart v. State · 561 So. 2d 638 - Steele v. State · 848 So. 2d 361 - Brown v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny felony that involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against an individual”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we affirmed the sentence because the PRR statute allows for the imposition of a PRR sentence for one of the enumerated felonies or under section 775.082(9)(a)1. o. for "[a]ny felony that involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against an individual" and the evidence adduced at trial was to the effect that the victim and the defendant struggled over the victim's purse and the defendant essentially dragged or pulled the victim toward the rear of her car.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “forcible felony provision of the PRR statute. In explaining our result we said: we affirmed the sentence because the PRR statute allows for the imposition of a PRR sentence for one of the enumerated felonies or under section 775.082(9)(a)1. o. for”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.