Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 SO2D 557 - Whitby v. State

Whitby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co. · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Melbourne v. State · Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc. · Betts v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A simple objection and allegation of racial discrimination is sufficient, e.g., `I object. The strike is racially motivated.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.