Bucacci v. Boutin’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 126 - Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach · 353 So. 2d 840 - Peacock Const. Co., Inc. v. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. · Willard v. Willard · Kozacik v. Kozacik · 51 So. 2d 435 - Triple E Development Co. v. Floridagold Citrus Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If Bucacci had, in the blissful early days of her relationship with Boutin, consciously intended to secure for herself a life estate in the property under all future circumstances, it is apparent from a perusal of the joint venture agreement as a whole that she neither indicated that intent in the document, nor definitively guaranteed herself that emolument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haddad v. Hester“that equitable lien claims may be brought in this district, even though the suit affects land not within the territorial jurisdiction of the court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haddad v. Hester
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.