Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 SO2D 587 - Polite v. State

Polite v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002)

Relies on United States v. Feola · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County · United States v. Yermian · Optimal Data Corp. v. United States · Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant's upper clothing slipped off and the defendant was able to get out of Officer Munoz's grasp. The defendant attempted to hit the officer and fled the scene. Officer Munoz sent out a BOLO [(be on the lookout)] for the defendant. Officer Santiago was also working patrol that evening, not undercover, and received Officer Munoz's BOLO call. Shortly thereafter, Officer Santiago observed the defendant riding his bike. The defendant got off the bike and started walking toward the police officer. Officer Santiago identified himself as an officer and directed the defendant to stop. The defendant submitted to officer Santiago's authority without a struggle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[lit is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle, having knowledge that he or she has been ordered to stop such vehicle by a duly authorized law enforcement officer, willfully to refuse or fail to stop the vehicle in compliance with such order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the person reasonably believed that the person attempting to effect the arrest or detention was not a law enforcement officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.