Kirsch v. Kirsch’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2022
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ace Electric Supply Co. v. Terra Nova Electric, Inc. · Bingemann v. Bingemann · Ballantyne v. Ballantyne · 536 So. 2d 1117 - Braddy v. State · Dinallo v. Gunster, Yoakley, Valdes-Fauli & Stewart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[a] latent ambiguity is said to exist where a contract fails to specify the rights or duties of the parties in certain situations and extrinsic evidence is necessary for interpretation or a choice between two possible meanings.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.