Mulgado v. Diaz

Angel MULGADO, Appellant, v. Reemberto DIAZ, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 6, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-07-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2012

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Angel Mulgado, pro se, Appellant.

¶2No appearance for Appellee.

¶3Philip C. Claypool, General Counsel, and Julia Cobb Costas, Staff Counsel, for Florida Commission on Ethics, Tallahassee.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The Commission on Ethics' motion to dismiss is granted. This appeal is hereby dismissed. Appellant as complainant was not a party to the proceeding below before the Commission on Ethics, and, therefore, is not a proper party to proceed in this appeal. See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin. Code Rule 34-5.011 (providing that the respondent is the only party to an action before the Commission on Ethics).

¶6BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.