Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

933 So. 2d 665

Docket No. 4D05-4577.

Priester v. State

Willie PRIESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-07-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2019

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Willie Priester, Okeechobee, pro se.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to appellant's right to seek clarification of his sentence in the trial court in accordance with the state's acknowledgement that, by scrivener's error, the phrase "consecutively with each other" was not deleted from the commitment form.

¶5STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

/933/so2d/665 · .json · Public domain