933 So. 2d 716 - Ray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(b) For offenses committed after July 1, 2001, “burglary” means: 1. Entering a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time open to the public or the defendant is licensed or invited to enter; or 2. Notwithstanding a licensed or invited entry, remaining in a dwelling, structure, or conveyance: a. Surreptitiously, with the intent to commit an offense therein; b. After permission to remain therein has been withdrawn, with the intent to commit an offense therein....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 153 So. 3d 992 - Andre T. Joseph v. State

2. “Give this statement of the elements if the charge is unlawfully remaining: To prove the charge of Burglary, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (Defendant) had permission or consent to enter a [structure] [conveyance] owned by or in the possession of (person alleged). (Defendant) after entering the [structure] [conveyance] remained therein Give a, b, or c as applicable. c. with the fully-formed conscious intent to commit or attempt to commit the offense of (forcible felony alleged).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 48 So. 3d 922 - Harris v. State