Kehler v. Eudaly’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2010
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority · Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. · Rowland v. Christian · 17 Cal. 3d 425 - Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California · Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While it is likely a foreseeable duty would be recognized in Texas under a Tara-soff/Tkompson fact situation with an identifiable victim, this ease would nevertheless fail to fall within its parameters. Thus, each of the appellees’ motion for summary judgment properly responded to the appellants’ only viable claim, a claim arising under Tarasojf/Thompson that has not yet been affirmatively adopted by our Texas Supreme Court and, in any event, is not applicable here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Limon v. Gonzaba
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.