Prear v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 195th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 981 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Halper · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Austin v. United States · United States v. Ursery · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.