Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 933 SW2D 926 - Goodwin v. Farmers Elevator & Exchange

Goodwin v. Farmers Elevator & Exchange’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schiles Ex Rel. Schiles v. Schaefer · Lineberry v. Shull · Roby v. Tarlton Corp. · Anderson v. Emerson Electric Co. · Eubanks v. Poindexter Mechanical Plumbing & Heating

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3. The testimony of any physician who treated or examined the injured employee shall be admissible in evidence in any proceedings for compensation under this chapter, but only if the medical report of the physician has been made available to all parties as in this section provided. Immediately upon receipt of notice from the division or the commission setting a date for hearing of a case in which the nature and extent of an employee’s disability is to he determined, the parties or their attorneys shall arrange, -without charge or costs, each to the other, for an exchange of all medical reports, including those made both by treating and examining physician or physicians, to the end that the parties may be commonly informed of all medical findings and opinions. The exchange of medical reports shall be made at least seven days before the date set for the hearing and failure of any party to comply may be grounds for asking for and receiving a continuance, upon proper showing by the party to whom the medical records were not furnished. If any party fails or refuses to furnish the opposing party with the medical records of the treating or examining physician at least seven days before such physician’s deposition or personal testimony at the hearing as in this section provided, upon the objection of the party who was not provided with the medical report, the physician shall not be permitted to testify at that hearing or by medical deposition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.