Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 934 A.2d 891 - Page v. State

Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Ring v. Arizona · Doggett v. United States · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Wainwright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We regard none of the four factors identified above (length of delay, reason for de lay, defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant) as either a necessary or sufficient condition to the finding of a deprivation of the right of speedy trial. Rather, they are related factors and must be considered together with such other circumstances as may be relevant. In sum, these factors have no talismanic qualities; courts must still engage in a difficult and sensitive balancing process. But, because we are dealing with a fundamental right of the accused, this process must be carried out with full recognition that the accused’s interest in a speedy trial is specifically affirmed in the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) In a criminal prosecution, the voluntary out-of-court prior statement of a witness who is present and subject to cross-examination may be used as affirmative evidence with substantive independent testimonial value.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The right to a speedy trial attaches as soon as the defendant is accused of a crime through arrest or indictment, whichever occurs first.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.