United States v. Maree’s Empirical Analysis
934 F.2d 196 · 1991
Citation profile
74 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably United States v. Williams-Davis (1996), United States v. Matta-Ballesteros (1995)
74 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Rushen v. Spain · Easter House v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonably relies on evidence indicating that a defendant has read the presentence report and discussed it with counsel.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“mandatory minimum penalty provided by law.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury’s deliberations or the effect of anything upon that or any other juror’s mind or emotions as influencing the juror to assent or dissent from the verdict -... or concerning the juror’s mental processes in connection therewith, except that a juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury’s attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.